<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not another 2008 social media review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prgossip.co.uk/not-another-2008-social-media-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prgossip.co.uk/not-another-2008-social-media-review/</link>
	<description>Lifestyle, fun stuff, consumer PR, social media, music and general ramblings</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jed Hallam</title>
		<link>http://www.prgossip.co.uk/not-another-2008-social-media-review/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed Hallam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prgossip.co.uk/?p=50#comment-8</guid>
		<description>One of the key issues that will dictate how social media develops as a tool will be the way in which consultancies explain the value and ROI of such new tools.

2009 will certainly see belts tightened, but when SocMed is so cheap (relatively speaking) to implement, it should explode next year.

Let's see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the key issues that will dictate how social media develops as a tool will be the way in which consultancies explain the value and ROI of such new tools.</p>
<p>2009 will certainly see belts tightened, but when SocMed is so cheap (relatively speaking) to implement, it should explode next year.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
